NQ AM Session Low Of Day Long Review
NQ’s AM-session long is framed through RTH opening-range-gap weakness, a sweep of last Thursday’s low, macro timing, and inversion fair value gap execution.
Date: 2026-09-28
Loading post from X…
A preserved copy is ready if the original cannot load.
Loading post from X…
A preserved copy is ready if the original cannot load.
[00:03] Welcome back, folks. How are you? Hope you’re doing well. Long time no see, right? So I did a couple road trips with the family, and we’re back home. So I spent today getting real close to price action, real intimate, like almost lover-like. So we’re looking at the Nasdaq here. It’s a daily chart. And how are you, by the way? You doing well? It’s wild out here, isn’t it? Better get yourself prepared. It’s going to get more intense. So, daily chart here, Nasdaq. I did two executions today.
[00:42] One was just to, you know, thumb my nose at the social media pundits that say that there is no macro, there’s nothing to them. I’ll talk a little bit about them as we go through this. I’m not going to make the video very, very long because I want to show you how simple this stuff is. Okay, let’s dial in on this little portion of price action right here. Now let’s play devil’s advocate for a moment. Okay, let’s assume for a moment that you think that we could potentially go higher.
Daily liquidity and wick context
[01:20] Now admittedly, that was more or less what I was looking for today—some reason to expect it to try to make a move higher. Okay, there are a lot of indications on the daily chart: relative equal highs, buy-side liquidity, and a reluctance on the part of price action to want to go lower recently while I was away. So if you watched my executions and the first one I showed this morning,
Loading post from X…
A preserved copy is ready if the original cannot load.
this wick here on the daily chart, I was referring to that and part of this buy-side imbalance, sell-side inefficiency.
[02:03] So we have a volume imbalance there up to this candlestick’s low, and it looked like this from the bullish perspective. So price worked down in here on Thursday of last week and then closed up higher. Now, whenever I see these types of formations, I like to look at the midpoint, or Consequent Encroachment, as I call it. So by measuring that from the close of that candlestick down to its low, that point right there. Now if you look at this price, it’s at 30,568.25.
[02:53] We have just settled for Regular Trading Hours—and I’m sorry, Electronic Trading Hours—and we have the close at 30,566.25.
So we didn’t close above that midpoint level. It looks nice, but it’s a little concerning for me. I want to see how we open at 6:00 PM Eastern Time in about 50 minutes or so. I should be done with this video, obviously, but you may not be able to see it yet on YouTube. But how we open and how we trade into the midnight hour tonight, Eastern Time, will be a little bit more indicative of what I’ll expect because we traded down below last Thursday’s low.
[03:44] And we’re going to annotate that here. That’s where that 30,370 level comes from. So when we talk about pools of liquidity, things that are pertinent to your journaling, observing, keeping data, this certainly fits the criteria. Okay, so you would have looked for this low, you would have looked for this Consequent Encroachment level there because it’s a wick, and we have a minor buy-side liquidity pool here and we have a minor buy-side liquidity pool there,
which we’re not going to annotate here. All right, so I’m going to take this blue shaded area off, and I’m going to change this line to red, indicating a sell-side liquidity pool, and this we’ll keep as green.
[04:36] Okay, just be mindful that the 30,568.50 level is simply the halfway point of last Thursday’s daily candlestick’s wick, and it is a discount wick because it’s below the body. All right, so we’re going to take this information, we’re going to go right into the 1-minute time frame, and we’ll look at price action over here.
All right, and, well, I thought I had the economic calendar copied. I was going to drop it right here, but there was really nothing on today’s menu for economic data. It is a Non-Farm Payroll week, so I always encourage my students to try to find a way to engage price action on the Monday of every Non-Farm Payroll week.
[05:33] Now beyond that, if you’re brand new, I try to shy away from inspiring new students to try to participate on Mondays. It’s a little bit harder for new students to grasp some of the consolidation aspects. Typical weeks that are non-Non-Farm Payroll weeks, they tend to be a little bit more problematic for new students. That doesn’t mean you can’t trade them, okay? But over the years, people have taken my comments out of context and said that ICT says never trade on Mondays, never trade on Fridays, never trade on Saturdays, or the second Tuesday of—you know, they’ve got all these little things because they’re usually trying to market something.
RTH opening range gap
[06:15] And I want you to take a look at how price worked up inside of—let’s go into Regular Trading Hours real quick. So here’s Regular Trading Hours right here. Okay, so we opened up with a discount Regular Trading Hours Opening Range Gap. Okay, so just a gap lower, basically, is all I’m saying.
So where we get the settlement from last Friday at 4:14 PM Eastern Time down to the opening price at 9:30 Eastern Time today, that is the discount gap. So it opened lower than where we settled the previous trading day in Regular Trading Hours settlement.
[06:57] So that’s the last print there. When you grade that by simply having the Fib on it, okay, this is where the science comes in. Okay, you grab your little Fibonacci tool down here, and you’re going to anchor it to the close of last Friday’s settlement for Regular Trading Hours. Again, be mindful of the lower right-hand corner down here. See where it says RTH? It makes it easy for this to appear. If you’re looking through the medium of Electronic Trading Hours, you’re not going to see this gap like this.
[07:33] Okay, so we draw it down into the opening price at 9:30. Now we can grade that, and we’ll just leave it at that. Okay, so now here’s what I was met with. We opened lower. The next candlestick, we went a little bit lower, and we traded up.
And notice what it did not do—it did not touch the lower quadrant level of the Opening Range Gap. Notice that. Now, as I teach order flow—not the stuff that Mickey Mouse book writers, authors, course sellers, you know, all the people out there with the mythology that somehow knowing how many people bought at a specific price is somehow indicative of what price is going to do in the future, which actually has nothing to do with it—but order flow in regards to how the candlestick either trades to a specific level, as I outline, or if it fails to trade to it.
[08:38] So a failure in delivery to a specific key level that we would already have expected and studied on price action, like the Opening Range Gap here—just simply the lowest quadrant level—that’s simple. That’s not complex. But if it can’t even trade there and it starts to sell off, well, that’s indicative of weakness. Where, in normal procedures, we’ll look for the likelihood of price trying to get up into the middle of the gap, or Consequent Encroachment, but we don’t want to see that if we can’t see at least the lower quadrant trade to.
[09:17] Now, a normal function would be trade up to the lower quadrant, come down, hit some measure of sell-side liquidity, and then shift the market structure, then at least return back into half gap. Then, if it’s bearish, you can roll over at that point, or three-quarter gap closure, or full gap closure. But it’s Monday, and we were given a gift. Okay, we were given a gift.
We’re going to go into this level down here, all right? This level right here, that 30,370 level, which was last Thursday’s daily low for the December contract for NQ, or Nasdaq.
[10:05] So December NQ futures, last Thursday’s daily low. When we have a gap, okay, and I’m going very, very slow because I want you to understand how simple the logic is. Now, it’s not simple because you probably know it like the back of your hand, but these are things that I teach, and these things go forward in the future, repeating the same type of logic, and the phenomenon repeats. But if we have a gap lower—so this is like a gap-and-go type premise—it gaps lower, tries to go higher into the gap, fails to trade to the lowest quadrant level. Very, very, very indicative. Okay, now watch. We’re going to add that. That’s the lowest octant. Now, what do I teach?
We traded to it and through it, but we couldn’t even touch the lower quadrant. But look where the body closes. It’s not laying on or above the lowest octant level.
[11:28] Is that bullish or is that bearish based on what good old ICT teaches, what real order flow is? See, order flow is not what has already been executed on. That’s not flow. That’s execution. And you need to know what’s going to happen next. See, flow is a state of movement. It’s in movement. You’re looking at static old news, old data points, what people have already executed on. That’s not flow. That’s an execution. It’s done. You need to know what is going to happen after those data points.
[12:14] It’s the hard right edge. That’s what we’re contending with as traders. So my logic is superior because I’m telling you what it’s going to do next and why. It matters not how many people buy or sell at a particular level. I don’t care what the volume number is, how many trades there were around a particular level. I don’t care about that. I don’t care and have any faith in Goldbach. I don’t have any faith in any of those things.
Here we have the logic that I teach. That body, look where it closes—below. Look, I’m going to zoom in. I’m going to zoom in right there.
[13:13] See how it fails to lay on or go above the lowest octant level. If you take the gap from where we settled at 4:14 PM Eastern Time last Friday and where we opened at 9:30 Eastern Time this morning, which is the beginning of the new Regular Trading Hours session, and you break that up into eight equal portions, the lowest eighth is down here. That’s an octant. The lowest quarter of it, this quadrant, is that level. Two things are being indicated here with real order flow as I teach it, because it’s algorithmic.
[16:14] I want you to see the logic that I teach here—two signatures in price action. The candle high here failed to get to the lowest quadrant, rather.
And then the close on this candlestick and the next candlestick body, neither of those were able to lay on or above the lowest octant of the gap. This is the gap right here. See that big separation between the closing price last Friday at 4:14 PM Eastern Time and the opening price at 9:30 Eastern Time today?
Bearish gap-delivery signatures
[16:52] That’s the Regular Trading Hours Opening Range Gap, or RTH ORG, not to be confused with the Opening Range, which is the first 30 minutes of trading from 9:30 to 10:00 AM Eastern Time. So that told me that I’m looking for something lower. But we had a bit of business come out today, okay? We had a piece of information come out, and one of my followers—I don’t want to say a student because I don’t think the person was a student. I mean, he really wasn’t technically following me—but he was responding to something I posted this morning, which was during the pre-session hours, where I proved that the macro absolutely does work.
Loading post from X…
A preserved copy is ready if the original cannot load.
[17:33] And I don’t look at news feeds. I don’t try to trade news. I don’t try to do those things. But using the logic of the Pre-Market Session, Overnight Session—and I’ll get into that—I did a small little scalp, and $6,990 came by way of a single run just like that. And I’ll get into that in a moment. But for now, I want you to think about how, if this is in fact bearish, where could it draw down to? Well, we know that Thursday—last Thursday—that’s that low down here.
[18:11] You see that? Remember, this is last Thursday’s daily low that we pulled up from the daily chart, and this line right here is that halfway point of the wick of last Thursday’s trading—Consequent Encroachment. Remember, keep your eye on this, that price. Okay, so when we started to drop lower and we meandered around in here, and then we broke lower, came back up, sold off, went down below that liquidity, my expectation, okay—not my knee-jerk reaction, “Let me chase price even though I think it’s going to go lower here”—I’m just going to stalk what I’m looking for.
[18:53] What is that? I want to see if they’re going to take it all the way down to Thursday’s low. That’s that red level there. If you can take it down there, that is helpful. It’s beneficial. Why? Because it’s diametrically opposed to what the public, the retail traders, were expecting. How do I know that? Well, when I posted the trade I did on Twitter.
[19:26] So if you look at that little vignette I made this morning, it’s like two minutes long, two and a half minutes long. The response was primarily just aimed at proving that macros are, in fact, a reality, and just because you don’t know how to use them doesn’t mean they don’t exist or that they’re not valid. Additionally, macros are not a time when volume, the number of buying and selling, should increase. Stop listening to people that don’t know what they’re talking about, okay? It’s simply when the price will spool.
[20:05] That means movement. And you do not need a lot of volume to make price move. You just need one contract.
[23:46] There was no news on the docket today for the economic calendar. So I’m thinking, okay, well, I know now that the retail perspective is bullish. It’s absolutely bullish because they think that there’s going to be an end to the war, or it’s going to be moving closer to ending the war between the US, Iran, and Israel. So because of that, that perpetuates the idea, along with these two signatures here, that it’s a gap-and-go.
[24:23] In other words, it’s a gap lower. Retail’s been fed an idea that, you know, we could be seeing some productive talks. Maybe, maybe not. I personally don’t think so, but, you know, that’s neither here nor there. And then we moved lower against that narrative that it should be bullish for price. Well, as you can see, it really wasn’t all that bullish, was it? And it took it all the way down to last Thursday’s low. That is effectively running against any idea that would be viewed as bullish by less-informed street money or retail traders.
Gap deviation liquidity target
[25:01] Going down to last Thursday’s low, okay, I know that that’s a strong likelihood by and of itself because we can see it on the daily chart. Two, now bring in the standard deviations and projections I teach you using gaps. What gap are we going to refer to here? The Regular Trading Hours Opening Range Gap. That’s this right here. Now watch what happens. I’m going to go in, I’m going to highlight that, and I want the Fib, not the actual box. There’s your Fib levels, okay?
[25:42] I’m going to scrunch this up so you can see the full range of that there, and we’re going to add a couple standard deviations. We’re going to cycle through them, okay? This is what I’m doing when I’m trading the daily highs and the lows—you know, what nobody else teaches you how to do—but I’m out here every week, not just showing you a chart with arrows on it, okay? I’m doing the execution. I’m placing a hard stop. I’m managing a position. I’m taking partials when I feel inclined to do so.
We’re going to go and take—there’s a -1 level there. Okay, see that? See what happened? Now watch. Look right here. Look right in here. The -1 line shows up right there. Now that’s below half the wick of last Thursday’s daily discount wick. Remember, that’s that level right here.
[26:54] And don’t let me confuse you. Don’t feel like I’m complicating something. The only thing we’re going to be doing is we’re going to get an agreement with standard deviation and a pool of liquidity. That’s what daily highs and lows work off of. And if it’s not that, it’s trading down to a key inefficiency or my Fair Value Gaps. It could be an Inversion Fair Value Gap, regular standard Fair Value Gap, either/or. It’s either inefficiency or liquidity. That’s what creates daily highs and lows.
[27:28] That’s it, folks. That’s it. That’s all it does. Now, when we look at adding 0.5 to that negative 1, now watch, this is going to drop down a little bit lower. Ready? Watch. Boom. Where’s that? Well, it’s no longer close to this. It’s further away from the halfway point of last Thursday’s daily discount wick, but we’re moving closer to that pool of liquidity. Now we’re going to change it to negative 2. See that? You don’t see it, do you? Negative 2 right here. Watch. I’m going to take the actual raw level away, that line, take it away.
[28:16] I’m going to highlight it here first and take it away. There’s two standard deviations of the Opening Range Gap. So it’s this range. There’s one of them, two of them. So it’s two standard deviations of the Opening Range Gap. That’s the level I’m keying off of with the pool of liquidity. That’s right there, based on last Thursday’s daily low.
[28:53] Now, up to this point, how hard is that? Now, if you don’t know the logic and the things I’m teaching, it’s impossible for you to see that. And that’s what I’ve been doing for decades, sitting amongst all of you, watching you all come down to the watering hole, and I’m picking you all off one by one. You don’t hear me, you don’t see me, you can’t smell me, you don’t even know I’m there. It’s almost like I’m a ghost in the machine. Market trades down. Now look, folks, pay attention.
[29:28] Pay close attention. We’re going to take the perspective that we now have here, and we’re going to go to Electronic Trading Hours. So we have two lines sharing a bit of business, or data, which is last Thursday’s daily low, and we have two standard deviations of the Opening Range Gap.
[30:14] That’s the difference between last Friday’s 4:14 PM Eastern Time last print, or final print, for Regular Trading Hours. It still traded until 5 o’clock, or 4:59, last Friday, but that was Electronic Trading Hours. We’re only measuring the movement and fluctuations between Regular Trading Hours and then when it resumes at 9:30 Eastern Time. Okay, I got a question, and I get this a lot every month. What happens if they ever go to full 24 hours? I have tools that I have never talked about. I have concepts that I’ve never talked about that are stronger and better than this.
[30:49] I don’t care. In fact, I hope they do. I hope they do 24 hours. I hope they trade 24/7. I hope they do, because I have things that are literally going to turn the entire industry upside down. And then everybody really will be writing books about me.
So we have the market dropping down in here. We have nice, clean relative equal highs here. We drop lower down in here. Now look—where are the bodies? They’re not on or below that pool of liquidity at 30,370, and it didn’t close at or below the second standard deviation of the Opening Range Gap for Regular Trading Hours.
[31:31] Everything I just presented to you—now these two lines here, you can see the two levels here. That’s simply last Thursday’s low.
Macro timing at session low
[35:10] The market trades down into 10:50. Okay, so we’re trading down into the macro, 10:50 to 11:10. It’s the last 10 minutes of the hour and the first 10 minutes of the new hour. Why does a macro even have any impact? Because large institutions, they have to space their purchasing or sale orders. They have to spread them out, okay? And it matters not how much the volume of their buying and selling is, because it’s not the pressure of the number of contracts. It’s the aspect of that order flow coming into the marketplace at a scheduled time.
[35:54] Now, when the market is allowed to elongate and protract, that means spooling, that means movement, and it doesn’t require a lot of volume to do that because the markets are algorithmic. It’s just going to keep offering a price when they want it to. And I understand that doesn’t fit the comfortable narrative that you think, that it’s buying and selling pressure. That’s not what makes markets go up and down, but that’s the fact. And it’s the last 10 minutes and the first 10 minutes. That period of 20 minutes is extremely important in terms of knowing what the market should do, where it should go, and the health of the underlying price run or the daily schematic or profile.
[36:44] When I say profile, that’s not volume profile. It’s how the daily chart will form that candlestick intraday—what fluctuations, what extreme to the high and the low, and what minor sell-side and buy-side liquidity will it encourage traders to participate in, get stuck in, and get burned on? All of those things are visualized better if you just take a chart, okay? Just take a chart and map out macro times. There’s nothing else on the chart but just that. You’re going to see very key price runs begin and end at those points just by themselves.
[37:25] That right there is going to be a laugh in the face of everybody that says it doesn’t have anything to it, there’s no substance to it, they’ll say. And it’s simply them illustrating ignorance on their part. They have no idea what they’re talking about. And then when you have me, the author of this stuff, I’ll come in here and I’ll tell you exactly what’s going to happen. Boom, there it is. I’m buying and selling the daily highs and lows. I’m not getting lucky once in a while.
[37:51] Every single week you can come out here and see me doing this stuff. Now let’s paint this narrative a little bit, okay, because the video is getting a little too long. The market trades down to two standard deviations of the Opening Range Gap. It goes against the narrative that retail traders would see as, it should go up because they said there’s going to be a talk about maybe quieting down this war. Wonderful. You have everything diametrically opposed against the weak hands, street money, the slow money, the smooth-brain traders, the people that have no idea what’s going on, and the indicator followers.
[38:26] All of them out there doing something, trusting that their little wiggle-waggle artifacts that they put on their chart are going to cause the market to go up and down. And they don’t. It goes right down to a key level of liquidity, sweeps it, and creates a little wick in there. Now, I graded that wick. It means I want to split it in half. I’m going to give it the likelihood to see if it can trade down there. If it would have done that, I would have gone long there, but it didn’t.
[38:58] And we’re getting close to the middle of the macro time. If I don’t see any spooling in the first half, I know—not I hope, I know. Okay, hear that? That’s authority. That’s authorship. I know that the last 10 minutes of that macro, it’s going to spool, it’s going to run, and I want to be in there. But the first 10 minutes, it’s okay if I don’t get the lowest low if I’m trying to go long, or the highest high if I’m going short, because I knew the last 10 minutes I’m going to be able to participate in it.
[39:38] It just means I’m going to forfeit the lower long entry or the highest short entry in price. So we have this little fair value gap right there ahead of that liquidity run at last Thursday’s low.
You would never see this measure of precision. The timing aspect of what I’m sharing—the world has never seen that before. It’s never seen it before. I promise you, if you listen to me and go through the motions of how I’m teaching you to study and collect the information over a period of one calendar year, you will know more about how price, why price, and when price will do things than anybody on this spinning rock will ever be able to teach you.
[40:48] Period. Mic drop. I promise you that you will never need to buy courses. You will never need to buy books. You’ll never need to join services. You’ll never need to do anything. You won’t have to watch videos, mine included. You simply want to be an independent thinker, and I’m trying to teach that to you.
Some of you are encouraging other people not to think that way because you want to build a base. You want to build something that you’re going to start monetizing. You may not do it now, but you’re going to. I promise you. [41:21] Everybody starts off here. They’re all ICT traders until they got something to sell, and then they try to distance themselves. That’s fine.
So we go down to a macro, we go down to a liquidity pool, we go down to a second standard deviation of the regular trading hours opening range gap.
Bullish response and long entry
[41:53] Perfect, perfect, perfect. And we get the inclusion of the bodies not going down to the second standard deviation or below that liquidity of last Thursday’s low. Is that bullish or bearish? As I teach real algorithmic order flow, it’s bullish. It’s bullish, folks.
And how about this pass right here? Look at the body. It didn’t get down there. So what does that mean? I can’t wait now. I have to execute. I have to participate. So if I’m looking for price to get back to, at a very minimum, take out these relative equal highs.
[42:34] That’s a real easy, low-hanging-fruit objective. Then we have this wick right here, which I’ll talk about in a moment. And then we have the 9:30 opening price, which is the beginning of regular trading hours for Monday, today, September 28th, 2026. So that’s this candlestick right here—9:30, that opening price. Price tends to use that like a magnet. It’ll draw right back up into it. Okay, and when we look at how price turned in here, it started to grind higher, came back down in, and used the gap here as my inversion fair value gap.
[43:20] Rallies up, consolidates a little bit in here. We have this down-close candle. If you grade the high to the low, that’s going to be a SIBI that you would see. It’s touching the line. You do it on your charts. I’m not doing everything for you.
But now, because we went above it, and if we’re looking for it to go higher, this is going to act as what? An inversion fair value gap. I’m not drawing it out. I’m just watching price action, and it should behave that way.
[43:53] Well, just for the benefit of showing you, there’s your inversion fair value gap inside of the graded price leg from the high to the low. The bodies are meeting around the halfway point. Same thing here.
Then we start leaving again, and then boom, we resume back in bullish order flow. We’re in a buy program. The market should use this gap. The bodies here went a little bit above it, so it indicates any retracement eventually is going to come back through that.
We get through here, trade back down into this buy-side imbalance, sell-side inefficiency.
[44:44] This is institutional order flow entry drill, and it’s also half of that Thursday on the daily chart—last Thursday’s discount wick. That’s that halfway point, the consequent encroachment. Look what it’s doing. It’s accumulating right there. Isn’t that nice?
Now price rallies up, we get above the relative equal highs, we trade up into this wick’s consequent encroachment there, and if we look at what we see in response to this gap, now you might look at that gap and say, “Okay, I like this gap. I’m going to call that my first presented fair value gap. I’m going to do this. I’m going to do that.”
Scaling at opening-price resistance
[45:20] But what I teach is, if you have a wick—if you have a wick to the left of the gap—you have to grade that. Now, there’s two things you could have went with. You could have went with this, could have graded that. There’s nothing inherently wrong with that. But me, I’m looking at this wick here. It could touch the 9:30 opening price, which it did right there. And then I want to see, do the bodies stay in the upper half here and not trade above and close above the 9:30 opening price?
[45:56] Because we’re bumping the low of the regular trading hours opening range gap. See it, that shaded orange area? It’s just trading back up to that. It’s trading back to the 9:30 opening price. It’s also trading in the upper half of this.
So we have this. This is what was the reason behind me scaling out at this point. Look where the bodies are. Perfect, perfect, perfect delivery. It’s telling me that it’s done enough. It’s not showing me any willingness to want to go higher. It did not close with a body at or above the 9:30 opening price.
[46:50] It did not close with a body at or above the low of the regular trading hours opening range gap. The bodies are staying inside of the upper half of that wick right there. See what’s happening there, folks?
That’s real order flow. That’s real technical science. That’s real understanding of what price is going to do and why it should do it. No indicator involved. It’s open, high, low, and close.
I said this back on BabyPips, okay, 2009. Everything is as simple as that: open, high, low, close.
[47:29] The secret sauce, the ingredient that’s missing—time. Time. So when we look at the executions, there’s me entering inside the inversion fair value gap right here. Look, see it? Look right here. There’s the entry. It’s not sexy, but it fits the criteria.
I have to give it a chance to get down into here because that would have been a better fill. But if it doesn’t give it to me, then I just have to get in there and participate. It’s not chasing price when you’re entering inside the inversion fair value gap.
[48:13] Both entries being inside the inversion fair value gap that was already on my chart before I executed. Okay, you can watch the full two-hour execution.
[48:55] Everything was outlined. Everything was outlined as to why I was expecting the 30,370 level, because the public was being primed to expect it to go higher. Market trades around in here, uses this inversion fair value gap there, then uses it there, and then we have this initial little response here.
But that candlestick already told you it’s going to go higher. The close is above the midpoint, and then we accumulate here. Institutional order flow entry drill at last Thursday’s consequent encroachment of its discount wick on the daily chart.
[49:30] You go look at that, and then we run all the way up into here. And then look right there, and then right there, and then finally my stop loss got stopped out there.
So, friends and neighbors, think. When I tell you a macro gives you a secret perspective that the normal everyday trader isn’t looking for, I don’t care. I do not care who tells you there’s another—there’s a different kind of macro, there’s a time that’s over here, it’s 17 minutes after the hour, it’s 20 minutes after the hour, it’s 40 minutes after the hour.
[50:19] They’re not macros. You’re looking at coincidence. I’m not teaching you, I’m not sharing with you examples of coincidence. My stuff is technical science. Everything else is Mickey Mouse. That’s not bragging. We’re talking facts. We’re talking statistical probabilities.
When it’s in my hands, it’s perfect. When everybody else out there is trying to automate it and they say to themselves, “We failed to automate it, so therefore it’s fake,” what do you do with this? Look at this—entering at the lows, exiting at the highs, and then getting stopped out with two contracts on a 10-contract run.
[51:05] Nice. Listen to me, folks. All your course sellers, all your talking heads, all your little heroes and your champions, all your little “most money in XYZ company,” “most profitable,” this person—they can’t trade like this, folks. And I’ve been begging for it for years. Just come out here and show me something that executes better than this, and I’ll be your student.
Come on, that’s the head you want to hang on your wall, right? ICT’s my student. I promise you that will never happen. I promise you, I promise you it will never happen, because this isn’t even my best stuff.
[51:48] This is just the simple stuff. This is me streamlining things down to make it very, very simple. I taught you here with Forex lectures standard deviations, a simple little approach to using what I was teaching with Asian ranges, central bank dealers’ ranges. I’m just simply using that logic with the regular trading hours opening range gap.
See, and you think it’s something new and it’s hard, it’s complex. It’s not. It’s not. But when you’re trying to add everything else because you think it’s necessary, you don’t have any other things being mentioned here.
[52:27] I didn’t talk about the first visit to the fair value gap. I didn’t talk about, you know, first reflection. Nothing. Nothing except for what I just showed you here: liquidity, time, and narrative.
The public is going to be goaded into expecting higher prices in the morning session, and then the rug pull lower down to where I’m waiting. I’m not reacting, I’m waiting. I’m anticipating, I’m expecting. I am stalking, hunting, pursuing, overtaking—bagged and tagged.
So hopefully you found something in this insightful. Hope it inspired you to keep on keeping on.
[53:21] And until I talk to you next time, Lord willing, be safe.
Loading post from X…
A preserved copy is ready if the original cannot load.
Loading post from X…
A preserved copy is ready if the original cannot load.
Loading post from X…
A preserved copy is ready if the original cannot load.
Loading post from X…
A preserved copy is ready if the original cannot load.
Loading post from X…
A preserved copy is ready if the original cannot load.
Loading post from X…
A preserved copy is ready if the original cannot load.
Loading post from X…
A preserved copy is ready if the original cannot load.
Loading post from X…
A preserved copy is ready if the original cannot load.
Keep learning with us.
Get new ICT lessons, study notes and updates as we build V2.